Arturo Fuente Chateau Fuente Sun Grown (King B) – Pyramid (6 x 55)
Jan 17, 2026Cigar Reviews
The Particulars
| wdt_created_by | cigarkey | brand | cigarname | vitola | strength | wrapper | binder | filler | infused | sweettip | origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mcclossm | Arturo Fuente Chateau Fuente Sun Grown (King B) - Pyramid (6 x 55) | Arturo Fuente | Chateau Fuente Sun Grown (King B) | Pyramid - 6.00" x 55 | Medium | Ecuadorian Sun Grown, Rosado | Dominican Republic | Dominican Republic | No | No | Tabacalera A. Fuente y Cia, Dominican Republic |
| COMPANY / BRAND: | Arturo Fuente |
| CIGAR: | Chateau Fuente Sun Grown (King B) |
| VITOLA: | Pyramid - 6.00" x 55 |
| STRENGTH: | Medium |
| WRAPPER: | Ecuadorian Sun Grown, Rosado |
| BINDER: | Dominican Republic |
| FILLER: | Dominican Republic |
| INFUSED: | No |
| SWEET TIP: | No |
| ORIGIN: | Tabacalera A. Fuente y Cia, Dominican Republic |
Prolegomenon and Other Random Thoughts
Is the King B really the king of the Chateau Fuente Sun Grown line? Either way, it’s a good excuse to smoke a pyramid!
| Journaling Date | Cigar | Appearance | Draw | Burn | Flavors | Overall Experience | Base Rating | Buy Again? | Final Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | Arturo Fuente Chateau Fuente Sun Grown (King B) - Pyramid (6 x 55) | Good | Average | Poor | Excellent | Great | 3.75 | Signs point to yes (recommended) | 7.83 |
The Review
This review for the Arturo Fuente Chateau Fuente Sun Grown (King B) - Pyramid (6 x 55) is based on the journal entry dated 2025-11-14
Appearance & Construction (0-3): Good (3)
I’m a fan of the Ecuadorian sun grown rosado wrapper they use on the Sun Grown line. The warm reddish deep brown leaf always seems to have good oil, nice sheen, light tooth and few veins. This one looks to have solid construction with good firmness and seams that are tight and blend in. It’s simply a good looking cigar for the money.
Draw (0-3) & Burn (0-4): Average (2) / Poor (1)
The draw is on the loose side of open with no real resistance but the foot lights beautifully. The ash is a light gray with tight striations. Unfortunately, the burn rapidly goes from beautiful to uneven and the burn line shoots down the seam in the first third. I’m hopeful that it will self correct, but it doesn’t. It canoes heavily the wrapper seam, creating an inch long discrepancy between the burning and not burning sides of the cigar. So I ash and apply a heavy correction, getting the burn back on track for the rest of the smoke. This is a fast burning cigar too. Between the loose draw and burn issues, it doesn’t seem packed fully even though it’s firm. It requires two more corrections due to the uneven burn in the final third.
Flavor Profile (0-5): Excellent (5)
But mmm… Immediate cinnamon and pepper spice over a strong woody base with a lot of leather on light up. Mild nuttiness, chocolate and coffee round out the initial flavors while the pepper cranks up quickly. It has a very citrusy sweetness that cuts into a light to medium creamy finish. But this is a bit of a flavor bomb in the first third. Robust, well balanced and actually encroaching on pepper bomb territory.
With the second third, there’s still a strong spicy kick of cinnamon and pepper with light nutmeg. It’s also still very woody, with a medium nuttiness and light breadiness. There’s moderate levels of chocolate and coffee. The base is still strong leather with mild earth. Flavors are still fairly robust overall and well balanced with nice complexity. It still has a very citrusy and tart sweet, with medium creaminess. Overall, very smooth with only the burn from the pepper to break up the creaminess of the finish.
In the final third I’m losing the chocolate and the sweet goes a bit more caramel. Cedar notes are back in force tamping back a bit of the leather. The coffee flavors are blending with the creaminess becoming more espresso like. But this blend is still🔥with the flavor intensity, complexity and nuance.
Overall Experience (0-5): Great (4)
I think the Sun Grown is my favorite of the core line so far. I’ll even make a bold statement that it’s better than most of the Opus X I’ve had and at roughly 1/3 of the price, puts them to shame from a value standpoint. The burn was a frustration, but the flavor profile more than makes up for it in my book. If this example had a draw and burn that kept up with the quality of the blend, it’d be a 9 versus the more pedestrian 7.8 it scored. If you need to Fuente on a budget, look no further than the Chateau Fuente Sun Grown. But maybe the King B is a bit more of the Joker than the King given the burn and draw.
Review Base Rating (0-5):
3.75
Would I Buy It Again?
Signs point to yes (recommended)
Review Final Score (0-10):
7.83
Overall Score and Individual Journal Entries
While the review is based off one instance of journaling this cigar; there’s a number of reasons you can have different experiences smoking the same cigar multiple times. A blend can evolve with age (for better or worse), palates evolves, preferences change, and sometimes you just get a bad example! This section captures the ratings from each journal entry and the related journal photo. Below you’ll find an aggregate score based on every time the cigar has been journaled. Unless it was a gift or on-off smoke, this section will be updated every time I journal this cigar!
| Times Journaled | Base Rating | Buy Again? | Final Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.75 | Signs point to yes (recommended) | 7.83 |
| Journaling Date | Cigar | Appearance | Draw | Burn | Flavors | Overall Experience | Base Rating | Buy Again? | Final Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-14 | Arturo Fuente Chateau Fuente Sun Grown (King B) - Pyramid (6 x 55) | Good | Average | Poor | Excellent | Great | 3.75 | Signs point to yes (recommended) | 7.83 |
Journaling Photos
The Flavor Wheel
| Category | Strength |
|---|---|
| Baking Spice | 3.00 |
| Pepper | 3.00 |
| Coffee / Espresso | 2.00 |
| Anise / Licorice | 0.00 |
| Sweet | 3.00 |
| Chocolate | 1.00 |
| Bready / Toasty | 1.00 |
| Woody / Charred | 3.00 |
| Grass / Hay | 0.00 |
| Earth | 1.00 |
| Leather | 3.00 |
| Floral / Aromatic | 0.00 |
| Fruity | 2.00 |
| Nutty | 2.00 |
| Salty / Mineral | 1.00 |
| Creamy | 2.00 |
| Musty / Barnyard | 0.00 |
| Bitter | 0.00 |
| Smooth | 2.00 |
| Harsh | 0.00 |
With every cigar I journal, I capture simple ratings of the basic flavor categories that I experience. These are more generalized than what you would see in a review, but a distinct profile can still be built out. When multiple instances of the same cigar have been journaled, the scores are averaged out in an attempt to build a reliable flavor profile based on my palate.
The values entered for the strength of each flavor range from 0 to 3.
- 0: No flavor detected
- 1: Mild flavor
- 2: Medium flavor
- 3: Strong flavor
Note: desktop / large screens will see a flavor wheel while mobile / small screens will see a bar chart.
With every cigar I journal, I capture simple ratings of the basic flavor categories that I experience. These are more generalized than what you would see in a review, but a distinct profile can still be built out. When multiple instances of the same cigar have been journaled, the scores are averaged out in an attempt to build a reliable flavor profile based on my palate.
The values entered for the strength of each flavor range from 0 to 3.
- 0: No flavor detected
- 1: Mild flavor
- 2: Medium flavor
- 3: Strong flavor
Note: desktop / large screens will see a flavor wheel while mobile / small screens will see a bar chart.
| Category | Strength |
|---|---|
| Baking Spice | 3.00 |
| Pepper | 3.00 |
| Coffee / Espresso | 2.00 |
| Anise / Licorice | 0.00 |
| Sweet | 3.00 |
| Chocolate | 1.00 |
| Bready / Toasty | 1.00 |
| Woody / Charred | 3.00 |
| Grass / Hay | 0.00 |
| Earth | 1.00 |
| Leather | 3.00 |
| Floral / Aromatic | 0.00 |
| Fruity | 2.00 |
| Nutty | 2.00 |
| Salty / Mineral | 1.00 |
| Creamy | 2.00 |
| Musty / Barnyard | 0.00 |
| Bitter | 0.00 |
| Smooth | 2.00 |
| Harsh | 0.00 |
Questions on how the ratings work?
Check out the detailed explanation here.
Want to Comment?
Leave a comment on the source IG post
