Definition Kinsman (Red Band) – Robusto (5 x 50)

Feb 6, 2026Cigar Reviews

The Particulars

wdt_created_by cigarkey brand cigarname vitola strength wrapper binder filler infused sweettip origin
mcclossm Definition Kinsman (Red Band) - Robusto (5 x 50) Definition Kinsman (Red Band) Robusto - 5.00" x 50 Medium - Full Mexican San Andrés, Natural Nicaragua Indonesia / Nicaragua No No Fabrica de Tabacalera, Nicaragua
COMPANY / BRAND: Definition
CIGAR: Kinsman (Red Band)
VITOLA: Robusto - 5.00" x 50
STRENGTH: Medium - Full
WRAPPER: Mexican San Andrés, Natural
BINDER: Nicaragua
FILLER: Indonesia / Nicaragua
INFUSED: No
SWEET TIP: No
ORIGIN: Fabrica de Tabacalera, Nicaragua

Prolegomenon and Other Random Thoughts

The Kinsman is a limited release of 4,000 cigars from Definition that was blended in collaboration with a core group of Definition’s customers, representing family and community, hence the Kinsman name. On the box, the wrapper is listed as passion, the binder as loyalty, and the filler as gratitude. This is what makes the social aspect of cigars great. It brings people together where you can be a part of a greater collective!

Journaling Date Cigar Appearance Draw Burn Flavors Overall Experience Base Rating Buy Again? Final Score
2025-08-19 Definition Kinsman (Red Band) - Robusto (5 x 50) Good Good Great Excellent Great 4.75 Without a doubt (box worthy) 9.67
2025-11-26 Definition Kinsman (Red Band) - Robusto (5 x 50) Good Good Good Excellent Excellent 4.75 Without a doubt (box worthy) 9.67

The Review

This review for the Definition Kinsman (Red Band) - Robusto (5 x 50) is based on the journal entry dated 2025-08-19

 

Appearance & Construction (0-3):  Good (3)

The Kinsman has a dark chocolate-colored wrapper that has a light oily sheen but no discernible mottling. There’s dense but small tooth on the wrapper, giving it a soft texture even though it’s a thick and firm wrapper. That thickness is evident in the seams which are tight, but visible with a strong edge. There are only a few thin veins present and no edge lift. The triple cap is even and tight. This Definition blend gets an intense red woven band that jumps against the wrapper.

 

Draw (0-3) & Burn (0-4):  Good (3) / Great (4)

The draw is spot on and the burn starts evenly, but with a mild wave to it. The ash is nearly white with super dark striations in it. The ash holds well through the first third and the burn line settles in to about dead even for the rest of the burn.

 

Flavor Profile (0-5):  Excellent (5)

Lots of malty cocoa to start and not much else, just a hint of baking spice and light woodiness. This starts off very dry and powdery, slightly chalky, but smooth. It takes about an inch, then the party starts with strong pepper and citrusy sweetness coming in. That woodiness is getting more charred and it’s joined by earth and nutty flavors.

With the second third, the pepper had settled into a nice light to medium, adding flavor and bite, but no extra harshness. This is still a very smooth cigar that’s picked up a super creamy finish, losing that initial dry quality. Still very heavy on the baking cocoa, but the citrusy sweet has amped up, giving it a little extra zing. Medium earth, nuttiness, charred oakiness, light barnyard, and a hint of vanilla round out the profile.

The blend has definitely found its groove and it’s on 🔥 at this point. The complexity is fantastic and it’s striking a really nice balance between contrasting qualities. It’s light and bright, but also dark and rich. It’s a bit like chocolate mousse with a lemon cream or chocolate key lime pie; it’s just delicious. The blend steamrolls with this robust set of flavors in perfect harmony through the final third. I get a quick blast of coffee at the very end, just enough to remind me that it was always there! 😅

 

Overall Experience (0-5):  Great (4)

This was a cigar where the first inch had me prepared for disappointment, but once the full profile revealed itself it was absolutely singing. Which brings me to the only real downside here: that they chose to go with a Robusto vitola. This is a blend that deserves more smoking time, especially if the first inch needs to ramp up. But overall, this is a highly enjoyable and well-done cigar. It’s definitely one to check out because it won’t be around for long!

 

Review Base Rating (0-5):

4.75

Would I Buy It Again?

Without a doubt (box worthy)

Review Final Score (0-10):

9.67

Overall Score and Individual Journal Entries

While the review is based off one instance of journaling this cigar; there’s a number of reasons you can have different experiences smoking the same cigar multiple times. A blend can evolve with age (for better or worse), palates evolves, preferences change, and sometimes you just get a bad example!  This section captures the ratings from each journal entry and the related journal photo.  Below you’ll find an aggregate score based on every time the cigar has been journaled. Unless it was a gift or on-off smoke, this section will be updated every time I journal this cigar!

Times Journaled Base Rating Buy Again? Final Score
2 4.75 Without a doubt (box worthy) 9.67
Journaling Date Cigar Appearance Draw Burn Flavors Overall Experience Base Rating Buy Again? Final Score
2025-08-19 Definition Kinsman (Red Band) - Robusto (5 x 50) Good Good Great Excellent Great 4.75 Without a doubt (box worthy) 9.67
2025-11-26 Definition Kinsman (Red Band) - Robusto (5 x 50) Good Good Good Excellent Excellent 4.75 Without a doubt (box worthy) 9.67

Journaling Photos

The Flavor Wheel

Category Strength
Baking Spice 2.00
Pepper 2.00
Coffee / Espresso 2.50
Anise / Licorice 0.00
Sweet 2.50
Chocolate 3.00
Bready / Toasty 2.00
Woody / Charred 2.50
Grass / Hay 0.00
Earth 2.00
Leather 0.50
Floral / Aromatic 0.50
Fruity 2.50
Nutty 1.50
Salty / Mineral 0.50
Creamy 3.00
Musty / Barnyard 1.00
Bitter 0.00
Smooth 3.00
Harsh 0.50

With every cigar I journal, I capture simple ratings of the basic flavor categories that I experience.  These are more generalized than what you would see in a review, but a distinct profile can still be built out.  When multiple instances of the same cigar have been journaled, the scores are averaged out in an attempt to build a reliable flavor profile based on my palate.

The values entered for the strength of each flavor range from 0 to 3.

  • 0:   No flavor detected
  • 1:   Mild flavor
  • 2:   Medium flavor
  • 3:   Strong flavor

Note: desktop / large screens will see a flavor wheel while mobile / small screens will see a bar chart.

With every cigar I journal, I capture simple ratings of the basic flavor categories that I experience.  These are more generalized than what you would see in a review, but a distinct profile can still be built out.  When multiple instances of the same cigar have been journaled, the scores are averaged out in an attempt to build a reliable flavor profile based on my palate.

The values entered for the strength of each flavor range from 0 to 3.

  • 0:   No flavor detected
  • 1:   Mild flavor
  • 2:   Medium flavor
  • 3:   Strong flavor

Note: desktop / large screens will see a flavor wheel while mobile / small screens will see a bar chart.

Category Strength
Baking Spice 2.00
Pepper 2.00
Coffee / Espresso 2.50
Anise / Licorice 0.00
Sweet 2.50
Chocolate 3.00
Bready / Toasty 2.00
Woody / Charred 2.50
Grass / Hay 0.00
Earth 2.00
Leather 0.50
Floral / Aromatic 0.50
Fruity 2.50
Nutty 1.50
Salty / Mineral 0.50
Creamy 3.00
Musty / Barnyard 1.00
Bitter 0.00
Smooth 3.00
Harsh 0.50

Questions on how the ratings work?

Check out the detailed explanation here.

Want to Comment?

Leave a comment on the source IG post