Drew Estate Kentucky Fire Cured (Fat Molly) – Robusto (5 x 56)

Feb 6, 2026Cigar Reviews

The Particulars

wdt_created_by cigarkey brand cigarname vitola strength wrapper binder filler infused sweettip origin
mcclossm Drew Estate Kentucky Fire Cured (Fat Molly) - Robusto (5 x 56) Drew Estate Kentucky Fire Cured (Fat Molly) Robusto - 5.00" x 56 Medium Mexican San Andrés, Natural Nicaragua Nicaragua Fire Cured No Fabrica de Tabacos Joya de Nicaragua S.A., Nicaragua
COMPANY / BRAND: Drew Estate
CIGAR: Kentucky Fire Cured (Fat Molly)
VITOLA: Robusto - 5.00" x 56
STRENGTH: Medium
WRAPPER: Mexican San Andrés, Natural
BINDER: Nicaragua
FILLER: Nicaragua
INFUSED: Fire Cured
SWEET TIP: No
ORIGIN: Fabrica de Tabacos Joya de Nicaragua S.A., Nicaragua

Prolegomenon and Other Random Thoughts

Kentucky Fire Cured. These are really interesting in principle alone. You get Kentucky and Virginia fire-cured tobacco as a starter. If you’re unfamiliar with fire curing, compared to the standard air-drying process, these tobaccos sit in barns that get filled with the smoke from burning hickory, maple, and oak wood. That tobacco then gets sent to the factory in Nicaragua, where it’s mixed with Nicaraguan and Brazilian Mata Fina filler. You then get a double wrapper of Tapa Negra at the head and Maduro San Andrés at the foot. Needless to say, it’s an interesting take on infusion and a more unique blend, so it was something I really wanted to try after learning about it.

Journaling Date Cigar Appearance Draw Burn Flavors Overall Experience Base Rating Buy Again? Final Score
2024-10-22 Drew Estate Kentucky Fire Cured (Fat Molly) - Robusto (5 x 56) 3.00 Outlook not so good (skip it) 4.67

The Review

This LEGACY review for the Drew Estate Kentucky Fire Cured (Fat Molly) - Robusto (5 x 56) is based on the journal entry dated 2024-10-22.

Note: My original review format only had a single overall score of 1 to 5 with the “Buy it Again?” value assessment.  This mean’s there’s no sectioned scoring for different factors and I didn’t capture data for my flavor wheel, which may be blank.  If I have journaled the cigar again since I began capturing flavor wheel data, that data will be present.  If the cigar is still available to me, I will eventually replace the legacy review with one in the current format. 

The Tapa Negra wrapper is super dark and oily. Both it and the San Andrés wrapper have good mottling, limited veins, and mild toothiness with tight seams. It’s a good-looking cigar that gives off a rustic vibe and has a very ample cap. It took a deep V-cut really nicely.

The cold smell is HOLY SHIT THAT’S STRONG. 😅 It’s straight bonfire with a heavy smokiness of the hickory, maple, and oak infusion. The cellophane does a good job of keeping the smell contained, and I would definitely try to keep these a little more separated from your other cigars. Definitely don’t mix them naked unless you want that bonfire smell imparted on them. I honestly don’t know if I would’ve bought these if I had smelled them at a local B&M first. 🫤 And I was a little hesitant about how that infusion was going to impact the flavors of the smoke.

Lit, it’s a much milder affair; at least it doesn’t taste like straight bonfire smoke. There are still a lot of the wood-burned flavors, heavy on the hickory to me, but there’s mild chocolate, spice, and sweetness that gets added to the mix. It’s very different from anything else I’ve smoked.

The draw was good, construction was on point. It had a decent char line that didn’t need any touchups until I got to the Tapa Negra wrapper. At that point it went out, took a lot of effort to relight, and only carried a little bit further before it was out again. The ash was fragile on this smoke; don’t try to go for a stack or you might wear it. 😅 My biggest gripe was that bonfire smell gets all over you. This is probably the worst offender in leaving a distinct odor on you post-smoke.

Overall, it’s a really interesting blend and very different from anything else I’ve had. I’m not sure it’s for me, but it could be a great summer BBQ and beer smoke. If you’re into smoking meats, definitely check this one out. 🔥

 

Review Base Rating (0-5):

3.00

Would I Buy It Again?

Outlook not so good (skip it)

Review Final Score (0-10):

4.67

Overall Score and Individual Journal Entries

While the review is based off one instance of journaling this cigar; there’s a number of reasons you can have different experiences smoking the same cigar multiple times. A blend can evolve with age (for better or worse), palates evolves, preferences change, and sometimes you just get a bad example!  This section captures the ratings from each journal entry and the related journal photo.  Below you’ll find an aggregate score based on every time the cigar has been journaled. Unless it was a gift or on-off smoke, this section will be updated every time I journal this cigar!

Times Journaled Base Rating Buy Again? Final Score
1 3.00 Outlook not so good (skip it) 4.67
Journaling Date Cigar Appearance Draw Burn Flavors Overall Experience Base Rating Buy Again? Final Score
2024-10-22 Drew Estate Kentucky Fire Cured (Fat Molly) - Robusto (5 x 56) 3.00 Outlook not so good (skip it) 4.67

Journaling Photos

The Flavor Wheel

Questions on how the ratings work?

Check out the detailed explanation here.

Want to Comment?

Leave a comment on the source IG post